He sat on the Homeland Security
Appropriations Subcommittee.
Azerbaijan was paying his wife.
Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX-28) served on the House Appropriations Committee’s Homeland Security subcommittee — the panel that sets funding for the agencies patrolling the border his district straddles. According to a May 2024 federal indictment, while he sat on that committee, he and his wife Imelda accepted approximately $600,000 in bribes from two foreign entities: SOCAR Texas Americas LLC, a subsidiary of Azerbaijan’s state oil company, and Banco Azteca, a major Mexican bank. In exchange, Cuellar allegedly steered U.S. policy to benefit Azerbaijan and used congressional access to assist the bank. He was indicted on federal bribery, money laundering, and foreign agent charges. He later received a presidential pardon from President Trump.
The border congressman. Controlling border funding. While a foreign government was on the payroll.
Henry Cuellar represented Texas’s 28th Congressional District — a border district where the Rio Grande is not a metaphor but a literal boundary separating his constituents from Mexico. His seat on the House Appropriations Committee’s Homeland Security subcommittee meant he voted on budgets for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, FEMA, and the U.S. Coast Guard. He helped determine how many agents patrolled the border he lived next to, how much was spent on infrastructure, and what resources were allocated to the agencies his constituents interacted with every day.
According to the Department of Justice, while Cuellar held that post, he and his wife were receiving money from a subsidiary of Azerbaijan’s state oil company — and using his position on the Appropriations Committee to steer U.S. policy in Azerbaijan’s favor. He also allegedly used his congressional access to assist Banco Azteca, a major Mexican bank with extensive cross-border operations and business interests before the U.S. government.
The money, per the indictment, did not go directly to Cuellar. It was routed through sham consulting contracts for Imelda Cuellar’s company — a laundering structure intended to obscure the relationship between the payments and the official acts they allegedly purchased.
Two foreign paymasters. One Appropriations seat. $600,000.
The May 2024 indictment describes two parallel bribery schemes operating simultaneously through the same vehicle: Imelda Cuellar’s consulting company. The DOJ alleged that both schemes exploited Cuellar’s congressional access — his ability to intervene in U.S. government processes, meet with agency officials, and influence Appropriations Committee decisions — as the thing of value being sold.
- 01SOCAR Texas Americas LLC — Azerbaijan’s State Oil CompanySOCAR Texas Americas LLC is a U.S. subsidiary of the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) — Azerbaijan’s state-owned oil and gas enterprise. According to the indictment, Cuellar accepted bribes from this entity and in exchange used his position on the House Appropriations Committee to steer U.S. foreign policy favorable to Azerbaijan. The indictment cited specific votes, meetings, and interventions. Cuellar was also charged with failing to register as a foreign agent — a federal requirement when acting at the direction of a foreign government or its instrumentalities.
- 02Banco Azteca — Major Mexican BankBanco Azteca is one of Mexico’s largest retail banks, associated with the Carlos Slim business empire and serving millions of customers — including in U.S.-Mexico border communities. According to the indictment, Cuellar accepted payments linked to Banco Azteca and in exchange used his congressional access and influence to assist the bank with matters pending before the U.S. government. The bank had ongoing regulatory and legislative interests in Washington during the alleged scheme period.
“The indictment alleges that Cuellar and his wife used his position as a congressman to advance the interests of foreign governments and foreign financial institutions — and accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in return.”
DOJ Office of Public Affairs — Statement on United States v. Henry Cuellar, May 3, 2024
What the Homeland Security subcommittee controls. And who was sitting on it.
The House Appropriations Committee’s Homeland Security subcommittee is not a ceremonial post. It sets the annual discretionary budget for the Department of Homeland Security — a roughly $60 billion annual appropriation covering U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), FEMA, the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Secret Service, TSA, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
Members of that subcommittee shape how the agencies operate — not just through budget line items but through report language, reprogramming approvals, and informal communications with agency officials who know where their appropriations originate. A sitting member of that subcommittee who is simultaneously being paid by a foreign government’s oil company — and using his position to advance that foreign government’s interests — represents exactly the conflict of interest the Foreign Agents Registration Act and federal bribery statutes were designed to prevent.
- →Bribery of a public official — 18 U.S.C. § 201 (accepting bribes in exchange for official acts as a Member of Congress)
- →Conspiracy to commit bribery — coordinated scheme with wife Imelda Cuellar
- →Acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government — specifically Azerbaijan — 22 U.S.C. § 612
- →Money laundering — routing bribe payments through sham consulting contracts
- →Both defendants plead not guilty · Trial set for 2025 · Case resolved by presidential pardon
A Democratic congressman. Pardoned by a Republican president.
In 2025, President Donald Trump (R) granted a presidential pardon to Henry Cuellar, resolving his federal criminal exposure before the case went to trial. The pardon was widely noted because Cuellar was a Democrat — and because his political profile was unusual for his party. He had been one of the most conservative House Democrats, voting with Republicans on immigration enforcement measures and opposing some progressive immigration positions favored by his party’s leadership.
The pardon did not expunge the indictment’s factual record. The DOJ’s charging document — a federal grand jury indictment — remains a permanent part of the public record. The allegations it contains: that a sitting Member of Congress on the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee accepted approximately $600,000 from Azerbaijan’s state oil company and a major Mexican bank, and used his official position to serve their interests, were never tested at trial. The pardon ended the proceedings. It did not answer the underlying questions.
“A pardon resolves criminal liability. It does not resolve the question of what a congressman with a seat on the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee was doing taking money from Azerbaijan's state oil company.”
Civic Intelligence Editorial Desk · April 2026 · Sources: DOJ May 2024 Indictment, S.D. Tex.
2005 to pardon. 19 years. Documented.
A federal grand jury said Azerbaijan was paying him. A Republican president pardoned him. The record remains.
Henry Cuellar sat on the House Appropriations Committee for 19 years. He controlled funding for the agencies that guard the border his district straddles. According to a federal grand jury indictment returned in May 2024, he accepted approximately $600,000 in alleged bribes from two foreign entities — Azerbaijan’s state oil company and a major Mexican bank — funneled through his wife’s consulting company.
In exchange, he allegedly steered U.S. policy to favor Azerbaijan, intervened in U.S. government processes to assist Banco Azteca, and failed to register as a foreign agent as the law requires. The indictment cited his specific votes, meetings, and interventions as a sitting member of Congress.
The case never went to trial. President Trump pardoned him in 2025. The pardon extinguished criminal liability. It did not retract the indictment, reverse the grand jury’s findings, or address what a border-district congressman with a Homeland Security appropriations seat was doing taking money from a foreign government’s energy company.