Drain the Swamp UCLA Law · April 21–28, 2026
Drain the Swamp · UCLA School of Law · First Amendment · Administrative Abuse

The Hecklers Got Off. The Hosts Got Threatened.

On April 21, 2026, 150+ protesters disrupted a DHS General Counsel event at UCLA Law School — shouting “Nazi,” displaying profane signs, and receiving death threats. Nobody was disciplined. The next day, Assistant Dean Bayrex Martí emailed the Federalist Society with a warning: identify the protesters and you could face campus proceedings.

Bayrex Martí, Assistant Dean for Student Affairs, UCLA School of Law · Matthew Weinberg, Federalist Society President · James Percival, DHS General Counsel

150+
Protesters
0
Disruptors disciplined
1
Admin threat to hosts
6–3
First Amendment. It's the law.
Primary footage: Protest at UCLA FedSoc — A Conversation with James Percival (Josh Blackman, on-scene)
§ 01 / The Event — April 21, 2026

The UCLA Federalist Society chapter invited James Percival, General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, to speak on April 21, 2026. The event was moderated by Professor Gregory McNeal of Pepperdine University School of Law. Approximately 70 people came to hear him.

More than 150 demonstrators organized by By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)and the UCLA Latiné Law Students Association gathered outside and inside. Their pre-event flyer compared Percival to Wilhelm Frick, Nazi Minister of Interior. Inside the room, approximately 50 protest attendees walked out when moderator McNeal announced Q&A would use pre-screened questions only.

Those who stayed disrupted continuously: sustained booing, students repeatedly shouting “Nazi” at the speaker, profane signs including “F**k you loser,”“Stop kidnapping people,” and a sign targeting Jewish FedSoc president Matthew Weinberg by name:“Weinberg — why’d you invite Nazis? Jew to Jew, Shame on You.”Students played doorbell sounds and clicked pens to create continuous noise. At least three were escorted out by UCPD.

Percival, post-event

“The administration made me promises. They promised to me and my team that they would maintain decorum in the classroom. And I think they utterly failed to live up to that promise.”

“I might get death threats when I go on a college campus, but the people I work with at DHS get death threats just for showing up to work every day. I really felt like I had an obligation to the people I work with not to back down.”

UCLA Law Dean Michael Waterstonelater acknowledged that “multiple individuals were issued warnings and escorted from the event or left of their own accord.” The event, he stated, “proceeded to its conclusion.” A conclusion in which the promised open Q&A was replaced by pre-screened questions and the speaker received death threats from the audience.

§ 02 / The Email — April 22, 2026

The day after the event, Bayrex Martí, UCLA’s Assistant Dean for Student Affairs, emailed Federalist Society President Matthew Weinberg. The emails were obtained by Fox News Digital.

Martí had seen requests online to identify students visible in video recordings of the disruption. Her message to the students who had just been subjected to shouted slurs, profane signs, and death threats: don’t share those names.

I have also seen requests online to identify students in the audience who are visible in video recordings. I would strongly encourage you and other organizers to not disclose those details.

Bayrex Martí, UCLA Assistant Dean for Student Affairs, email to Federalist Society President Matthew Weinberg — April 22, 2026

The threat was explicit: if names were shared and any protester subsequently faced online criticism from any third party, the Federalist Society itself could be held responsible for “reasonably predictable” consequences under the Student Code of Conduct — subjecting the student organization and its members to campus disciplinary proceedings.

The Legal Problem With This Email

UCLA is a campus of the University of California system. It is a public university — a state actor directly bound by the First Amendment. The students who disrupted a public, filmed, on-campus event had no legally cognizable privacy interest in their public conduct. Identifying someone from a public video recording is protected speech.

What Martí’s email did: threaten a student organization with discipline for engaging in constitutionally protected speech — in order to shield disruptors from the social consequences of their own public conduct. That is textbook viewpoint discrimination by a state actor.

§ 03 / FIRE Responds — First Amendment Violation

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) sent a letter to UCLA urging the university to retract what it described as a threat against the Federalist Society’s First Amendment rights. FIRE program counsel Jessie Appleby wrote:

Students attending a public, recorded event have no expectation of privacy.

Jessie Appleby, FIRE Program Counsel — letter to UCLA Law School

As painful as online criticism may be at times, UCLA may not restrict protected speech merely to shield student protesters from the consequences of their actions.

Jessie Appleby, FIRE Program Counsel

Sustained disruption preventing others from hearing a speaker has no place at a university committed to free inquiry.

Jessie Appleby, FIRE Program Counsel

FIRE also identified the double standard directly: while UCLA threatened the Federalist Society for potentially identifying protesters, BAMN had circulated organizing flyers naming Percival. The Latiné Law Students Association issued a public statement naming and shaming the Federalist Society and Weinberg by name. No disciplinary warning was issued to either group.

Victor Davis Hanson: UCLA Mob Tactics, Crime Culture, and the SPLC's Influence
§ 04 / The Pattern — Stanford, Yale, Northwestern

This is not a UCLA-specific failure. It is a documented pattern at elite law schools. In every recorded case, the administration either declined to discipline the disruptors or threatened the conservative hosts. Jonathan Turley noted UCLA’s own rules explicitly prohibit what happened — protests “so disruptive as to effectively silence” invited speakers — and then declined to enforce them.

The Three-School Pattern

Stanford Law — March 9, 2023:Fifth Circuit Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan was shouted down by ~100 students. Stanford’s Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity & Inclusion stepped onto the stage to berate the judge rather than restore order. Stanford ruled out disciplining the hecklers. Result: Judges James Ho (5th Cir.) and Elizabeth Branch (11th Cir.) announced a clerkship boycott of Stanford.

Yale Law — March 2022: Students packed a hall and shouted down Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom. Same judges imposed a prior clerkship boycott on Yale. No discipline for disruptors.

Northwestern — undated: Students forced cancellation of an ICE guest speaker. University condemned the action. No discipline.

UCLA — April 2026: 150+ protesters disrupt, death threats made, Nazi comparisons deployed. No discipline for disruptors. Conservative hosts threatened with discipline instead.

§ 05 / Who Is James Percival?

James Hamilton Percival IIis the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — the agency’s top legal officer, responsible for guiding DHS policy on immigration, cybersecurity, and homeland security operations. He was confirmed by the Senate in December 2025.

Before DHS, Percival served as Florida’s Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Chief of Staff to Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, and Deputy Attorney General of Legal Policy — all appointed by Governor Ron DeSantis. He clerked for the 11th Circuit and practiced at Cleary Gottlieb. Between college and law school, he was a substitute teacher and missionary in South America.

He showed up anyway. He knew there would be protests. He had been threatened. He came because, he said, the people who work for DHS receive death threats every day just for doing their jobs.

§ 06 / Who Runs UCLA?
Who Runs UCLA School of Law

Dean:Michael Waterstone — acknowledged the disruption, noted warnings and removals, declared the event “proceeded to its conclusion.”

Assistant Dean for Student Affairs:Bayrex Martí — sent the disciplinary threat to the Federalist Society on April 22, 2026.

University of California system: Governed by the UC Board of Regents, a public body. UCLA is a state actor bound by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

DOJ Civil Rights Division:Harmeet Dhillon’s office was already investigating UCLA over prior campus protest incidents. The April 21 event and Martí’s email were added to that inquiry. Dhillon posted: “Oh, @UCLA, ... Adding To The List .... And it’s the wrong list.”

UCLA Protesters F*ck Around And Find Out — Asmongold TV
§ 07 / The Bottom Line
Bottom Line

150 students disrupted a lawful, publicly filmed event. They called the speaker a Nazi. They targeted the Jewish student organizer by name. A DHS General Counsel received death threats in a UCLA classroom. UCLA’s own rules explicitly prohibit this. Nobody was disciplined.

The day after, UCLA’s Assistant Dean for Student Affairs sent a disciplinary threat — not to the disruptors — but to the students who hosted the event, warning them not to identify the people who had just subjected them to slurs and threats.

FIRE called it a First Amendment violation. Jonathan Turley called it a failure to enforce UCLA’s own policies. DOJ Civil Rights opened a file on it. UCLA responded that it is “committed to the First Amendment.”

Weinberg’s statement: “If this is what it looks like for conservative law students trying to host a speaker at an American law school in 2026, we are not staying silent about it.”