She held the head. CNN fired her. She blamed Trump.
On May 30, 2017, comedian Kathy Griffin posed with photographer Tyler Shields holding a fake, blood-soaked replica of President Donald Trump’s severed head. CNN fired her the same afternoon. The Secret Service opened a federal investigation. Venues across the country canceled her bookings. On June 2, she stood before cameras with attorney Lisa Bloom and wept, calling herself a victim of a “bullying campaign” by the Trump family. She apologized. Then she retracted the apology. Then she blamed Trump for ruining her life. Then she filed lawsuits. This is the documented record.
May 30, 2017 — Tyler Shields, a fake head, and a photographer who knew exactly what he was doing
The photograph was the work of Tyler Shields, a Los Angeles-based photographer with a history of provocative celebrity shoots. The image showed Griffin, in black, holding aloft a prop styled to look like a bloody, severed human head with the features of President Donald Trump. The “blood” was red material applied to a mask. The image left nothing ambiguous about what it depicted. It was published May 30, 2017.
Griffin initially described the session as an “artsy fartsy statement” about Trump. By the time the image went viral on May 30, that framing had collapsed. Within hours, the backlash was total and bipartisan. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper, Griffin’s co-host on CNN’s New Year’s Eve special for eleven years running, tweeted that the image was “clearly disgusting and completely inappropriate.” Cooper is not a conservative. His condemnation was categorical.
President Trump responded on Twitter: “Kathy Griffin should be ashamed of herself. My children, especially my 11 year old son, Barron, are having a hard time with this. Sick!” Melania Trump issued a statement describing the image as “disturbing” and noting its effect on the couple’s youngest child. The White House press secretary at the time, Sean Spicer, called the image “vile and vicious.”
“I sincerely apologize. I went way too far. The image is too disturbing. I understand how it offends people. It wasn't funny.”
Kathy Griffin, public video apology, May 30, 2017 — later retracted in full
Sources: ABC News, May 30, 2017; NBC News, May 30, 2017; CNN statement, May 31, 2017; Washington Post, May 30, 2017.
May 31, 2017 — eleven years of New Year’s Eve, terminated in 24 hours
CNN had employed Kathy Griffin as co-host of its New Year’s Eve live broadcast since 2007 — eleven consecutive years alongside Anderson Cooper. The network terminated that relationship on May 31, 2017, one day after the photo went public. CNN’s statement was brief and unequivocal: “CNN has terminated our agreement with Kathy Griffin. We are pleased to wish her well in her future endeavors.”
The firing was the most consequential institutional consequence Griffin faced in the immediate aftermath. The New Year’s Eve broadcast was her highest-profile recurring platform — nationally televised, an annual tradition. It was gone within 24 hours of the image’s publication.
Additional consequences followed rapidly. Squatty Potty, the toilet-stool product company that had built a widely viewed ad campaign around Griffin, terminated its relationship with her. At least seven venues canceled scheduled performances from her ongoing comedy tour in the days following the photo’s release, with further cancellations accumulating in the weeks ahead. The Entertainment Tonight and IMDB reporting confirmed venue pulls at bergenPAC in New Jersey and the Uptown Theatre in Napa, among others, as the last theater on her tour dropped her in June 2017.
Duration of the CNN New Year’s Eve relationship: 2007–2016, eleven years. Time from photo publication to termination: approximately 24 hours.
Source: CNN statement, May 31, 2017, reported by NBC News, Newsweek, ABC News, and Washington Post.
Federal inquiry, no-fly list claims, and 18 U.S.C. § 871
The United States Secret Service opened an inquiry into the photograph as a potential threat on the president’s life. 18 U.S.C. § 871 makes it a federal felony to knowingly and willfully make any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States. The image depicted a simulation of exactly that outcome.
Griffin later stated publicly that federal authorities had placed her on no-fly and Interpol lists and that the U.S. Attorney’s Office had considered charging her with “conspiracy to assassinate the president of the United States.” She stated she was informed of this by her attorneys. She was investigated by the Secret Service and by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Approximately two months after the photo was published, Griffin announced she had been cleared and that no charges would be filed.
Griffin subsequently claimed that President Trump had personally ordered the investigation to be pursued as retribution — a claim she made in a 2019 ABC News interview. She described it as a “vendetta.” No primary documentary evidence was produced to substantiate the claim that Trump personally directed the investigation; the Secret Service’s routine role in evaluating potential threats to the president is institutional and does not require presidential direction.
The statute applies to threats communicated by any means. The question investigators faced was whether a widely published photograph depicting the simulation of a presidential beheading constituted a “threat” within the statute’s meaning. Griffin was cleared after federal review. The review itself was real.
Source: 18 U.S.C. § 871 (primary); ABC News, 2019; CBS News, 2019.
“He broke me” — and then she retracted that too
Three days after the photo was published, on June 2, 2017, Griffin held a press conference alongside attorney Lisa Bloom. The stated purpose was to address the controversy. What emerged was a reframing: Griffin positioned herself as the victim of a “bullying campaign” by the Trump family. She wept. She said “He broke me.” She claimed that the family of the president of the United States had “grown men” — referring to Trump’s adult sons — “trying to silence a comedian” by objecting publicly to an image of their father’s simulated decapitation.
The press conference was widely covered and widely criticized as a poorly conceived pivot. Salon described it as a “mad, looping press conference.” Jezebel described it as “a poorly conceived mess.” Even observers sympathetic to Griffin found the framing difficult to sustain: the image had been published voluntarily, by Griffin and her photographer, and the institutional responses that followed — CNN’s firing, venue cancellations, the Squatty Potty termination — were the foreseeable consequences of a voluntary act.
The relationship between Griffin and Bloom deteriorated after the press conference. By October 2017, Griffin had publicly cut ties with Bloom, describing the press conference as a disaster and stating Bloom had given her bad advice. Griffin’s characterization of Bloom shifted from “my attorney” to “fame-whoring.” Bloom disputed the characterization. Griffin demanded a refund. The public falling-out was reported by NBC Philadelphia, TMZ, Law & Crime, and the Washington Free Beacon.
“He broke me. He broke me. And then I was like: I'm not going to do this.”
Kathy Griffin, press conference with Lisa Bloom, June 2, 2017 — referring to President Trump
“I take that apology back. F*** him.”
On May 30, 2017 — the day the photo went viral — Griffin published a video apology. She stated: “I sincerely apologize. I went way too far. The image is too disturbing. I understand how it offends people. It wasn’t funny.” The apology was unambiguous and direct.
In November 2017, she retracted it. “I take that apology back by the way,” she said. “I take it back big time.” She said she had received bad advice at the time of the apology.
In 2018, appearing on ABC’s The View, Griffin went further. “I take the apology back,” she said. “F*** him. I’m not holding back on this family.” ABC7 San Francisco covered the retraction. The Washington Free Beacon covered a subsequent television appearance in which Griffin exploded at a host who pressed her on the retracted apology, saying: “You’re full of crap.”
In 2019, Griffin re-posted the original photo. She cited the indictment of Trump by Jack Smith’s office when she re-posted it again in 2023, according to Newsweek. The photo — the one she had said was “too disturbing” and “not funny” — she shared again, voluntarily, twice in subsequent years.
November 2017:“I take that apology back by the way. I take it back big time.”
2018 (The View):“I take the apology back. F*** him. I’m not holding back on this family.”
2019: Re-posted the original photo.
2023: Re-posted the original photo again, citing the Trump indictment.
Sources: Out.com, April 2018; WIBW, 2017; ABC7 San Francisco; Newsweek, 2023; Washington Free Beacon.
Unemployable, uninsurable, and still blaming Trump
The documented consequences of the May 30, 2017 photo were extensive and sustained. Beyond the CNN firing and Squatty Potty termination, Griffin’s comedy tour collapsed. Entertainment Tonight and IMDB News confirmed that the last theater on her tour — the Uptown Theatre in Napa — dropped her in June 2017, following bergenPAC in New Jersey and several other venues that had canceled earlier that month. A separate 2024 Facebook post aggregated by news outlets described Griffin’s 2024 comedy tour as canceled “three dates in due to terribly low ticket sales.”
In a 2022 Fox News interview, Griffin described herself as “unemployable” and “uninsurable” in the aftermath of the photo. “I’m still on the D-list,” she said, referencing the E! Network reality series My Life on the D-Listthat had made her a cable television fixture in the mid-2000s. She attributed her career difficulties entirely to Trump and the Trump family’s public responses to the photo.
In NPR’s 2019 profile, Griffin said she had lost a third of her fan base. In the same interview she stated that she had received death threats, been confronted in public, and experienced what she described as social and professional isolation. She said: “I’d do it all again.”
By February 2026, Griffin was telling Deadline that she considered herself “uncanceled.” The framing was hers. The documented record of the preceding nine years was what it was.
“I lost a third of my fan base.” — NPR, April 2019.
“I don’t think I will have a career after this.” — June 2 press conference, 2017.
“I’d do it all again.” — CBS News interview, 2019.
“I’m uncanceled.” — Deadline, February 2026.
Sources: Fox News Digital, 2022; NPR, April 23, 2019; CBS News, 2019; Deadline, February 2026. All direct quotes attributed in primary reporting.
The documented sequence, in order
A clinical summary
Kathy Griffin voluntarily posed for and published a photograph depicting herself holding a fake, bloody replica of the sitting president’s severed head. The federal government opened an investigation. Her employer of eleven years fired her the next day. Multiple venues canceled her bookings. Her corporate sponsors dropped her. She held a press conference three days later and cried about being bullied. She apologized. Then she retracted the apology. Then she blamed the president for the consequences of her own voluntary act.
The image was not hacked from her phone. It was not published without her knowledge. It was a deliberate creative decision, described at the time as an “artsy fartsy statement,” executed with a professional photographer and published to her public accounts. The consequences that followed were the foreseeable consequences of that decision.
By 2019, she had told NPR she would do it all again. By 2023, she had re-posted the photo a second time. By 2026, she was telling Deadline she considered herself uncanceled. The apology — the one she gave on the day and described as sincere — she retracted in full, twice, with expletives.
The case is unusual in TDS taxonomy not because the original act was the most extreme of the genre — though it was among the most extreme — but because of the structure that followed: apology, retraction, lawsuits, repeated republication, ongoing attribution of all consequences to the subject of the original act. It is a case study in what happens when the act is indefensible, the apology is insincere, and the accountability is redirected outward.
“I sincerely apologize. I went way too far. The image is too disturbing.”
Kathy Griffin, May 30, 2017 — retracted November 2017; retracted again on The View, 2018