Pay $50,000, Lie at the Interview, Buy a Citizen. The State Department Just Said No.

For a fee that runs from $40,000 to $80,000, the package is the same the world over: a coach who scripts your visa interview, fake documents to plug the holes in your story, a furnished apartment near a U.S. hospital, and a delivery plan timed to drop an American citizen onto American soil. The product being sold is a U.S. passport for an unborn child. On June 10, 2026, the State Department said it had spent months quietly tearing the supply chain apart.

In a series of posts on X, the department detailed more than 600 cases across three continents: a West African network of more than 100 foreign nationals built on fraudulent documents and visa “fixers”; more than 400 suspected cases in Europe since 2024, traced to at least six companies that coached applicants, arranged housing, and coordinated births; and a North African embassy that revoked more than 100 visas from parents who, investigators said, came to the United States primarily to give birth.

The framing was blunt. “A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,” the department wrote. Several operators were hit with permanent bans from the United States. It is the most aggressive consular enforcement of an old rule in years — and it lands while the Supreme Court weighs whether the 14th Amendment guarantees the very citizenship these packages were selling.

• 600+ cases — outlined by the State Department across West Africa, Europe, and North Africa in its June 10 crackdown · Source: Newsweek, American Bazaar
• 400+ — suspected birth-tourism cases identified in Europe since 2024, traced to at least 6 coaching companies · Source: The Federalist, State Dept
• $40K–$80K — per-customer fee charged by the Irvine, California maternity-tourism ring the DOJ broke up — the template these networks still run · Source: DOJ, Central District of California
• ~20,000–26,000 — estimated birth-tourism babies born in the U.S. each year (CIS estimate) — a sliver of 3.61M annual births, but a real industry · Source: FactCheck.org, MPI

The State Department did not bury the news in a cable. It posted it. “Under President Donald Trump (R), the State Department is defending the integrity of U.S. citizenship by ending illegal birth tourism schemes,” the department announced on X on June 10, 2026, in a thread that laid out the case numbers region by region. The core legal point was stated as flatly as possible: “No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U.S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U.S.”

Then the line that became the headline: “A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right. The State Department is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, dismantle birth tourism networks, and hold accountable those who try to scam our system.” The department credited the work to “consular officers — working with law enforcement and using data analytics” who, it said, “identified several networks abusing the system and put a stop to it.” Several of the operators behind those networks, the department added, have been permanently barred from the United States.

Keep Reading

Society · Title IX

A Washington Family Sues Over a Girls' Wrestling Match. The State's Policy Is on Trial.

Read →

Birth tourism is not a woman buying a plane ticket. It is, in the State Department’s telling, an organized service industry. In Europe, investigators said at least six companies ran the full assembly line: they “coached applicants on how to answer visa interview questions, arranged housing in the United States, and coordinated delivery plans designed to facilitate childbirth on American soil.” In West Africa, the network of more than 100 people leaned on fraudulent documents and paid intermediaries the department called “fixers” — the people who manufacture the paper trail that makes a tourist look like a tourist.

The deception turns on a single moment: the consular interview. The applicant must convince an officer she is coming to sightsee, not to deliver. FactCheck.org, reviewing the case files, found operators who coached clients to “trick U.S. Customs at ports of entry by wearing loose clothing that would conceal their pregnancies.” That is why the new guidance instructs consular officers to scrutinize visitor-visa applications far more rigorously when an applicant shows indicators of pregnancy or intent to give birth in the U.S. — and why a denial or revocation now follows reason to believe that childbirth is the primary purpose of the trip.

“No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U.S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U.S.”

U.S. Department of State · June 10, 2026

None of this is theoretical, and none of it is new. The model the State Department is now chasing overseas was already prosecuted in the United States. In 2019, federal prosecutors in the Central District of California unsealed indictments naming 19 people tied to three Chinese “birth tourism” rings that authorities say helped thousands of foreign nationals give birth in the U.S. to secure citizenship for their children — the first-ever federal criminal charges against operators and customers of such businesses. The cases grew out of a 2015 probe by ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations and IRS Criminal Investigation that saw agents execute roughly three dozen search warrants.

The marquee defendant was Dongyuan Liof Irvine, who ran You Win USA Vacation Services Corp. from 2013 to 2015. According to the DOJ, Li used some 20 apartments to house clients, charged each customer between $40,000 and $80,000, and took in roughly $3 million in wire transfers from China over two years. Her customers were coached to tell U.S. consular officers in China they would stay only two weeks — when they planned to stay up to three months to give birth. Li pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit immigration fraud and visa fraud. The fee structure, the coaching script, the false statement of intent: every element the State Department flagged in 2026 is visible in a case the government closed years ago.

Keep Reading

Society · Education

$400,000 for Consultants. A Reading Score That Went Backward. This Is San Francisco Schools.

Read →

The crackdown lands on contested ground. The entire premise of birth tourism is that a child born on U.S. soil is a citizen — the prevailing reading of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. President Donald Trump (R)moved to narrow that reading on his first day back in office, signing Executive Order 14160 on January 20, 2025, which sought to deny automatic citizenship to children of unauthorized immigrants and of foreigners present only temporarily — tourists, students, and short-term workers. Every lower court to consider the order has blocked it; it has never taken effect.

The Supreme Court took the case — Trump v. Barbara — and heard arguments on April 1, 2026, with Trump himself in the courtroom, the first sitting president to attend such a session. Chief Justice John Robertspushed back on the administration’s claim that “we’re in a new world” since the amendment’s 1868 ratification: “It’s the same Constitution.” A decision is expected by the end of June. Until then, the visa crackdown is the administration’s available lever: it cannot rewrite who becomes a citizen at birth, but it can refuse the visa that gets the mother through the door.

The honest answer is: real, but not enormous — and that is part of the fight. The most-cited figure, from the Center for Immigration Studies, estimates 20,000 to 26,000 birth-tourism babies born in the U.S. each year, against roughly 3.61 million total U.S. births in 2020. The Migration Policy Institute’s Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh notes the higher estimate is “a tiny fraction” of all births, and the Cato Institute’s David Biercalls the practice “a small number of people” that is “nothing new.” Critics use those numbers to argue the crackdown is symbolic.

But scale is not the only measure of a fraud. The State Department’s case is narrower and harder to wave away: whatever the total, these specific applicants obtained — or tried to obtain — visas by lying about why they were traveling, sometimes with fabricated documents, sometimes through paid networks built for exactly that. Visa fraud is a federal crime regardless of how many people commit it, and the U.S. births at issue carry decades of downstream citizenship benefits. The Irvine prosecutions established the principle in court; the 2026 actions extend it to the consular window, before the plane ever boards.

The visa crackdown and the court case are running on parallel tracks toward the same question. If the Supreme Court leaves birthright citizenship intact — the way most observers read the April arguments — the entire incentive behind these packages survives, and the State Department’s only tool remains the consular interview: deny the visa, revoke it on discovery, ban the fixers. Expect the department to keep publicizing case counts as a deterrent, and expect the networks to keep adapting their scripts, as the Irvine ring did until agents knocked on the door.

For now the record is clear enough to state plainly: a paid industry exists to sell American citizenship to people who lie to get the visa that makes it possible, the federal government has convicted operators of exactly that, and in June 2026 it moved that enforcement upstream to embassies on three continents. Whether 26,000 babies a year or 600 documented cases, the principle the State Department asserted is the one worth holding it to — that a visa earned by fraud is not a visa at all. We will update this page as the Supreme Court rules and as further enforcement actions are disclosed.

More From Civic Intelligence

Society · Accountability

They Raised $634,000 for His Defense. Then He Told the Court He's Penniless.

Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murdering Austin Metcalf and sentenced to 35 years. His family…

Drain the Swamp · Texas

The Lawmaker Who Sat on the Public Education Committee — and Sold DEI to the Schools He Oversaw

Texas state Rep. James Talarico (D-TX), now the Democratic U.S. Senate nominee, spent years as a…

Last updated June 11, 2026