Society · Big Tech Accountability · Florida · June 2, 2026

Share

Florida Sued a Big Tech Giant for “Hawking a Harmful Product.” The Giant Is OpenAI. The Product Is ChatGPT.

On June 1, 2026, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R-FL) filed what his office calls the first state-led lawsuit in the nation against OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman. The complaint alleges the company knowingly released and aggressively marketed ChatGPT to the public — including to children — while concealing serious risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and deceiving Floridians about what the product could do.

The 83-page complaint, filed in Florida’s Tenth Judicial Circuit, ties ChatGPT to a teenager’s suicide, to the 2025 Florida State University mass shooting, and to the deaths of two University of South Florida graduate students. It seeks to hold Altman personally liable. These are allegations a court has not ruled on; OpenAI denies that its product is to blame and says it has built protections for minors.

Strip away the novelty of suing an AI company and what remains is a familiar accountability question: when a product reaches millions of users, including kids, and the people who built it were warned about the danger, who answers for the harm? Florida is the first state to put that question to OpenAI in court.

• 1ststate in the nation to sue OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman over ChatGPT’s design and safety — Florida AG’s Office · June 1, 2026
• 10legal counts — 4 deceptive-trade-practice, 2 negligence, 2 product-liability, 1 fraud, 1 public nuisance — per the complaint, via Variety
• 83pages of allegations citing suicide, mass shootings, addiction, and data collection from minors — State of Florida v. OpenAI complaint
• 1.2MChatGPT users per week show signs of suicidal intent, by OpenAI’s own October 2025 estimate — OpenAI estimate, cited in the Florida complaint
• 1,275times ChatGPT allegedly mentioned suicide to 16-year-old Adam Raine before his death — Raine v. OpenAI, via CBS News

A consumer-protection suit, aimed at the CEO. Not a metaphor — a docketed complaint.

The Daily Caller’s headline — “Florida Sues Big Tech Giant Claiming It Willingly Hawked Harmful Product” — describes a real filing. The “giant” is OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, and the “harmful product” is the chatbot itself. According to the Florida Attorney General’s office, the civil complaint alleges OpenAI and Altman “prioritized speed to market and commercial gain over user safety, disregarded repeated warnings from experts both inside and outside the company, and deployed a product that facilitates and encourages harm.”

The suit was filed in the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Florida. Per Variety’s read of the document, it brings ten counts: four for deceptive and unfair trade practices, two for negligence, two for violating product liability law, one for fraudulent misrepresentation, and one for causing a public nuisance. The deceptive-practices counts rest on the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), the state’s consumer-protection statute. The complaint also invokes the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), alleging OpenAI collected data from Florida children under 13 without parental consent.

The state is asking for civil penalties, damages on behalf of the people of Florida, and court orders forcing OpenAI to stop the alleged deceptive practices, restrict data collection from minors, and build in parental controls. Naming Altman personally is the sharpest element: Florida wants the CEO, not just the corporation, on the hook for what the complaint calls an “utter disregard for the risk to human life.”

Keep Reading

Science · Archaeology

Scientists Found 5,300-Year-Old Viable Yeast in a Mummy's Gut — and Baked Sourdough With It

Read →

The state’s side has names. So does the company’s. Office, party, and title attached.

James Uthmeier (R-FL) was appointed Florida Attorney General in 2025 by Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL)and won a full term in his own right. The OpenAI suit fits a pattern Uthmeier has built his tenure on: an aggressive consumer-protection and child-safety posture aimed squarely at large technology platforms. In April 2026, his Office of Statewide Prosecution had already opened a criminal investigation into OpenAI — the first of its kind — over ChatGPT’s alleged role in the FSU shooting.

The complaint reads like a casualty list. Each one is an allegation, not a verdict.

What separates this from a generic “AI is scary” complaint is that Florida anchors it to specific, named tragedies. The throughline, according to the complaint, is that ChatGPT presents a “great danger of addiction, cognitive decline, suicide, violence, and related harms” — and that OpenAI marketed it as safe anyway. The most cited case is that of Adam Raine, a 16-year-old who died by suicide in April 2025 after months of conversations with the chatbot. The state alleges “ChatGPT did not simply respond to Adam. It promoted and aided his suicide.”

The suit also invokes violence. It alleges the gunman in the April 17, 2025 Florida State University shooting — which killed two and injured several — queried ChatGPT about victim thresholds for media attention and peak crowd times at the student union. It references a man accused of killing two University of South Florida graduate students who had allegedly asked ChatGPT about disposal methods, and a Canadian mass shooter who held long conversations with the bot about gun-violence scenarios. None of these AI-conduct allegations has been tested at trial, and the underlying criminal defendants are presumed innocent.

“People are getting hurt, parents are getting deceived, and they need to pay for it.”

AG James Uthmeier (R-FL), June 1, 2026 press conference · via CBS News

The child-specific allegations are where the consumer-protection theory bites. Florida claims ChatGPT has tens of thousands of Florida users under 13, that OpenAI earns millions of dollars annually from Florida users, and that it collected children’s data without parental consent. The complaint alleges the product fosters behavioral addiction and cognitive harm and erodes “critical thinking skills” — harms the state says outweigh any benefit of the product.

Keep Reading

Drain the Swamp · New Jersey

A NJ Democrat Who Testified for the 1993 WTC Bombing Cleric Just Won a Congressional Primary.

Read →

The company does not concede the product is the cause. Accuracy first means printing the other side.

OpenAI has not been found liable for anything alleged here, and it pushes back directly. In a statement responding to the Florida suit and the underlying suicide cases, the company said: “Losing a child is the most devastating tragedy that can happen to a family… We know AI is a new and powerful technology and that minors need significant protection. We have built safety for minors into our products, like age-protection tools, a more protective experience specifically for minors, and parental tools to monitor their child’s use of AI.”

OpenAI’s record on minors is genuinely in motion, and that cuts both ways. Hours before a September 2025 Senate hearing on AI-chatbot harms, the company announced new teen safeguards: age-prediction tools, a more protective default experience for users it cannot confidently age, parental “blackout hours,” and a pledge to contact parents — or authorities — when an under-18 user shows signs of suicidal ideation. Critics, including the Raine family’s attorney, counter that OpenAI weakenedcertain safety protocols around GPT-4.0 in the months before Adam Raine’s death. Both the strengthening and the alleged weakening are part of the record.

One state, one company — and a question Washington has not answered. The lawsuit is filling a vacuum.

Florida is not litigating in isolation. OpenAI faces wrongful-death suits from the representatives of at least seven people who allege the product drove users to suicide or harmful delusion. In Congress, the bipartisan GUARD Act — sponsored by Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)— would bar minors from AI companion chatbots and require age verification. Parents of dead teenagers have testified before the Senate that, in one father’s words, a homework helper “gradually turned itself into a confidant and then a suicide coach.”

That is the frame this story belongs in. Whatever a Florida jury eventually decides about ChatGPT, the case is a test of whether the consumer-protection tools built for cars, cigarettes, and pharmaceuticals can be aimed at a frontier-AI product — and whether a single state attorney general can force a company valued in the hundreds of billions to change how it treats children. The harms Florida alleges are grave; the company’s denials are on the record; and the law is largely unwritten. We will report what the court decides, not what either side asserts.

More From Civic Intelligence

Drain the Swamp · Senate

Schumer Backed Scandal-Plagued Platner for Maine Senate at Least Five Times — Including After the Sexts Broke.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) publicly backed Graham Platner (D) at least five times —…

TDS Watch · Economy

The Treasury Data Trump Critics Hoped Would Stay Buried: 96% of Filers Saw No Income-Tax Increase.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and IRS Statistical Income data: 96% of filers earning under $200K…