Society · DOGE Watch · June 22, 2026

A $2,000,000,000,000 Jet That Can Fly Every Mission Just One Day in Four.

The F-35 is the most expensive weapon system in the history of the United States — a program the Government Accountability Office now pegs at more than $2,000,000,000,000 over its full life cycle. On June 11, 2026, the GAO released a report with a blunt headline: the jet keeps getting more expensive to keep flying, and it keeps flying less.

The numbers are stark. In fiscal 2025, only 24.6 percent of the F-35 fleet was “fully mission capable” — ready to perform all of its assigned missions — down from 38 percent in 2021. Just over one jet in four. The broader “mission capable” rate, which counts a jet able to fly even a single tasked mission, fell to 44.1 percent, from 67 percent four years earlier. Both figures are the worst on record, and both are far below the program’s own targets.

This is not a partisan story. The F-35 has bled money and missed readiness goals across Democratic and Republican administrations alike — it is bipartisan defense waste, documented by Congress’s own auditors. What GAO did this June was put a price on the failure and warn that the Pentagon’s expensive fix may not work.

§ 01 / The Headline Numbers

GAO’s report (GAO-26-108113) is titled, with auditor restraint, “Actions Needed to Ensure Updated Strategy Improves Persistent Readiness Challenges.” Translated: the jets are not ready, the new plan might not fix it, and the bill keeps climbing. The fully-mission-capable rate — the share of the fleet able to perform every assigned mission at any given moment — sat at 24.6 percent in fiscal 2025. The Air Force’s F-35A variant fared even worse on some metrics, with one tally putting fully-mission-capable A-models around 28.5 percent. Whichever measure you use, roughly three out of four of America’s premier stealth fighters cannot do their full job on a given day.

The F-35 is DOD's most costly weapon system, but it hasn't met performance goals and costs to sustain the aircraft continue to increase.

GAO-26-108113, F-35 Sustainment, June 11, 2026
U.S. GAO — Diana Maurer testifies on F-35 sustainment and readiness challenges
§ 02 / The $2 Trillion Tab

The cost trajectory is its own scandal. GAO’s 2024 sustainment review found the program office estimated it will cost at least $1,580,000,000,000 just to operate and sustain the U.S. F-35 fleet across its life cycle — up from $1,100,000,000,000 in 2018, a 44 percent jump in five years. Add acquisition costs and the total tops $2,000,000,000,000. Part of the increase came from extending the fleet’s planned service life out to 2088. The grim irony GAO flagged: the services now plan to fly the jet less than originally projected, yet the cost to keep it flying keeps rising.

GAO now pegs the F-35's lifetime cost above $2 trillion — roughly $1.58 trillion of it just to operate and sustain the U.S. fleet, up 44% from the 2018 estimate. The services plan to fly it less, yet the bill keeps climbing.
X
U.S. GAO
@USGAO · June 2026· paraphrase

Our new report: the F-35 is DOD's most costly weapon system, but readiness has declined for years and sustainment costs keep rising. The fully mission capable rate is down to about 1 in 4 jets. We made 3 recommendations.

X
Valerie Insinna
@valerieinsinna · June 2026· paraphrase

New GAO report: F-35 full mission capable rate fell to ~25% in FY25. Pentagon wants an extra $13.7B through FY31 for its sustainment reset — but GAO warns industry capacity and parts shortages could sink the plan. Readiness may get worse before it gets better.

§ 03 / Why It Can't Fly

GAO laid out the mechanics of the grounding. The fleet is starved for spare parts: a 2025 Lockheed Martin study identified 48 parts the supplier base cannot make in sufficient quantity — including canopies, which GAO has repeatedly named as a top driver of grounded jets. Depot maintenance is a bottleneck; the backlog at Tinker Air Force Base, the primary depot for the F135 engine, has grown steadily as the program historically underinvested in sustainment infrastructure. Software delays meant some brand-new jets arrived unable to fly their missions at all. Corrosion problems added to the pile. The Pentagon now says it will need to lean on more than $7,000,000,000 in private-sector parts procurement to dig out.

The Readiness Gap, In One Box

Full mission capable (FY2025): 24.6% — against a 2030 target of 65%.

Mission capable (FY2025): 44.1% — against a 2030 target of 80%.

The fix: a $13,700,000,000“GSS Reset” the Pentagon launched in June 2025, meant to hit those targets by 2030. GAO’s warning: readiness will likely worsen before it improves, with gains possibly not showing up until late 2026 or later.

U.S. GAO — F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Actions Needed to Address Late Deliveries
§ 04 / The Incentives That Paid for Failure

The most damning finding for taxpayers is about money the government chose to hand over. From 2020 through 2023, the F-35 Joint Program Office paid contractor Lockheed Martin more than $114,000,000 of roughly $269,000,000 in available incentive fees — bonuses tied to improving the fully-mission-capable rate and parts supply. Over the very same window, GAO found, those metrics “generally stagnated or worsened.” In plain terms: the Pentagon paid more than $114 million in performance bonuses while performance fell. GAO concluded the incentive thresholds were misaligned with what the services actually needed, and that the documentation behind the fee awards lacked basic quality control.

From 2020 to 2023 the program paid Lockheed Martin over $114 million of $269 million in available incentive fees meant to lift readiness and parts supply — while both measures stagnated or got worse, GAO found.
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump · Truth Social commentary · 2026

The F-35 program and its cost are out of control. Billions and billions of dollars can and will be saved on military (and other) purchases after January 20th. We don't pay for failure.

Paraphrased commentary · not a verbatim post

Trump's long-running framing of F-35 cost overruns — paraphrased and labeled as commentary, echoing his documented December 2016 criticism that the program's cost was 'out of control.' Not a verbatim post.

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump · Truth Social commentary · 2026

A TWO TRILLION DOLLAR airplane that can only fly its full mission one day out of four? And we paid the contractor BONUSES while it got worse? Those days are finished. We pay for RESULTS, not excuses.

Paraphrased commentary · not a verbatim post

Trump's standing posture on defense-program cost and readiness — paraphrased and labeled as commentary, not a verbatim post.

§ 05 / Will the $13.7 Billion Fix Work?

The Pentagon’s answer is the “Global Support Solution Reset,” launched in June 2025 and needing an estimated $13,700,000,000 more than previously planned through fiscal 2031. The plan leans on Lockheed putting more than $2,000,000,000 of advance funding into spare parts and engine-maker Pratt & Whitney investing over $1,000,000,000 across five years to boost F135 production by 20 percent. GAO’s caution is pointed: the same constrained industrial base that created the parts shortage now has to ramp up dramatically, and the program has no firm risk mitigation plan if it can’t. There is also a deeper structural problem — the Pentagon still lacks the technical data to maintain much of the jet independently of the contractor, which is part of why it keeps paying premium prices for parts and labor.

X
U.S. Department of Defense
@DeptofDefense · June 2026· paraphrase

The F-35 remains the cornerstone of allied air power. Through the Global Support Solution Reset, the Joint Program Office is focused on driving up readiness and driving down sustainment costs for the warfighter.

CNBC — Donald Trump pits Boeing against Lockheed over F-35 cost
§ 06 / The Bottom Line

Strip away the acronyms and the picture is simple. The United States has committed more than $2,000,000,000,000 to a fighter that, on any given day, can fly all of its missions roughly one time in four — and the cost to keep it flying has risen 44 percent in five years even as the services plan to fly it less. The Pentagon paid its contractor over $114,000,000in readiness bonuses while readiness fell, and has implemented just 14 of GAO’s 46 sustainment recommendations since 2014. Now it wants another $13,700,000,000 for a fix its own auditors warn may not land until 2030, if it lands at all. This is the rare accountability story with no partisan villain — just a generation of bipartisan procurement decisions, and a bill that lands on every taxpayer regardless of party. We’ll track whether the GSS Reset moves the readiness numbers, or whether the next GAO report reads exactly like this one.

Last updated June 22, 2026